Determination of Yield, Quality and Chemical Composition of Palm Oil and Palm Kernel Oil of Fresh Fruit Bunches with Variation Maturity as A Basic for Determining Harvest Maturity Standard

Main Article Content

Hasrul Abdi Hasibuan

Abstract

Fresh fruit bunches (FFB) maturity greatly affects the yield and quality of crude palm oil (CPO), kernel, and palm kernel oil (PKO). Conventional criteria for mature harvest are still used for determining production targets. These criteria are also used as a basis for developing mechanized and digitalized harvesting technologies. This research was conducted to determine the optimum harvest FFB maturity criteria based on the number of loose fruit from bunches before harvesting, related to the yield, quality, and chemical characteristics of CPO and PKO. Samples used were Tenera type FFBs with the variety of maturity including unripe (reddish black fruit), under-ripe (red fruit but no loose fruit), ripe (loose fruit of 1-3 grains), ripe (loose fruit of 5-10 grains), and overripe (loose fruit of 20-40 grains). The yield of CPO, kernel and PKO increased with increasing fruit maturity. The riper fruit, free fatty acid content and peroxide value of CPO increased. It was also the same for carotene content and deterioration of the bleachability index (DOBI) but the value of both decreased in overripe fruit. The iodine value and fatty acids composition differed of each fruit maturity. Generally, in some Tenera varieties, the average of yield of CPO and kernel, and quality of CPO in ripe fruits (1-3 grains) were relatively same to ripe fruit (loose fruit 5-10 grains). Thus, the optimal yield and quality of CPO, kernel and PKO can be obtained by harvesting of FFB on the mature criteria with a number of loose fruit 1-3 grains.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hasibuan, H. A. (2020). Determination of Yield, Quality and Chemical Composition of Palm Oil and Palm Kernel Oil of Fresh Fruit Bunches with Variation Maturity as A Basic for Determining Harvest Maturity Standard. Jurnal Penelitian Kelapa Sawit, 28(3), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.22302/iopri.jur.jpks.v28i3.106
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Hasrul Abdi Hasibuan, Indonesian Oil Palm Research Institute

Palm Oil Product Development & Quality Research Group

References

Arifin, A.A. 2010. Ripeness Standards and Palm Fruit Maturity Affecting Oil Extraction Rates (OER). Oral Presentation in International Conference Exhibition of Palm Oil (ICEPO). Jakarta Convention Center. Juni 2010.
[AOCS] American Oil Chemist’s Society. 2005. Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the AOCS. Ed ke-5. Champaign. Illinois (US): AOCS.
Corley, R.H.V., and P.B. tinker. 2003. Growth, Flowering and Yield. The Oil Palm. Fourth Edition. Blackwell science Ltd. 89-131.
Fatin, S.A., S. Rosnah and R. Yunus. 2014. Effect of Chopping Oil Palm Fruit Spikelets on the Free Fatty Acid Content Release Rate and its Mechanical Properties. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology. 3(1): 511-516. eISSN: 2319-1163.
Fauzi, N.A., and M.R. Sarmidi. 2010. Extraction of Heat Treated Palm Oil and their Stability on Beta-Carotene During Storage. Journal of Science and Technology. 45-54.
Hasibuan, H.A., dan E. Nuryanto. 2015. Pedoman Penentuan Potensi Rendemen CPO dan Kernel Buah Sawit di Kebun dan PKS. Buku Seri Populer 16. Penerbit Pusat Penelitian Kelapa Sawit. Medan.
Hasibuan, H.A., Warnoto, A. Lubis, Magindrin, Ijah dan S. Silalahi. 2015. Asam Lemak Bebas, Karoten, DOBI dan Korelasinya pada Crude Palm Oil (CPO). Prosiding Pertemuan Teknis Kelapa Sawit 2015. Yogyakarta 19-21 Mei 2015. ISBN 978-602-7539-24-2.
Hasibuan, H.A. 2016. Pengaruh Penundaan Waktu Pengolahan Buah Sawit Terhadap Berat, Rendemen Crude Palm Oil (CPO) & Kernel Serta Mutu CPO. Warta Pusat Penelitian Kelapa Sawit. 20 (1): 27-36.
Keshvadi, A., J.B. Endan, H. Harun, D. Ahmad, dan F. Saleena. 2011. Palm Oil Quality Monitoring In The Ripening Process Of Fresh Fruit Bunches. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Sciences and Technologies 4 (1): 026 – 052.
Kusumaningtyas, R.S., and L. Limantara. 2009. The Isomerication and Oxidation of Carotenoid Compounds in the Oil Palm Fruit During Productions of CPO. Indonesia Journal Chemistry. 9(1): 48-53.
[MPOB] Malaysian Palm Oil Board. 2004. MPOB Test Method: A Compendium of Test on Palm Oil Products, Palm Kernel Products, fatty Acids, Food Related Products and Others.
Prada, F., I.M.A. Diaz, W. Delgado, R.R. Romero and H.M. Romero. 2011. Effect of Fruit Ripening on Content and Chemical Composition of Oil From Three Oil Palm Cultivars (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) Grown in Colombia. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59: 10136-101442.
Razali, M.H., A. Somad, M.A Halim and S. Roslan. 2012. A review on Crop Plant production and Ripness Forecasting. International Journal of Agricultue and Crop Sciences. IJACS/2012/4-2/54-63.
Sujadi, M. Rivani, H.A. Hasibuan, T. Herawan dan A.R. Purba. 2016. Kadar dan Komposisi Kimia Minyak pada Bagian-Bagian Buah Kelapa Sawit (Elaeis guineensis Jacq) dari Delapan Varietas PPKS. Jurnal Penelitian Kelapa Sawit. 24(2): 67-76.
Sujadi, H.A. Hasibuan dan M. Rivani. 2017a. Karakterisasi Minyak Selama Pematangan Buah pada Tanaman Kelapa Sawit (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) Varietas D x P Simalungun. Jurnal Penelitian Kelapa Sawit. 25(2): 59 – 70.
Sujadi, H.A. Hasibuan, dan M.I. Lubis. 2017b. Performa Tanaman Muda D x P PPKS dalam menghasilkan Rendemen CPO dan Kernel pada Satu Areal Lahan. Presentasi Poster pada Pertemuan Teknis Kelapa Sawit 2017 yang Diadakan oleh Pusat Penelitian Kelapa Sawit. Solo.
Teh, H.F., B.K. Neoh, M.P.L. Hong, J.Y.S. Low, T.L.M. Ng, N. Ithin, Y.M. Thang, M. Mohamed, F.T. Chew, H.M. Yusof, H. Kulaveerasingam and D.R. Appleton. 2013. Journal Plose One. 8(4):1-10. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061344t001.
Tranbarger, T.L., S. Dussert, T. Joet, X. Argout, M. Summo, A. Champion, D. Cros, A. Omore, B. Nouy and F. Morcillo. 2011. Regulatory Mechanisms Underlaying Oil Palm Fruit Mesocarp Maturation, Ripening, and Functional Specialization in Lipid and Carotenoid Metabolism. Plant Physiology. 156: 564-584.

Most read articles by the same author(s)